User talk:Candlebury: Difference between revisions
(Spitter note) |
m (→spitters: np) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==spitters== | ==spitters== | ||
That note about puddle-pulling seems suited for the fighting section. Looks good. | That note about puddle-pulling seems suited for the fighting section. Looks good.[[User:KA101|KA101]] ([[User talk:KA101|talk]]) 00:32, 23 April 2014 (PDT) | ||
Yeah better fit for the fighting section, you are right. Thanks. [[User:Candlebury|Candlebury]] ([[User talk:Candlebury|talk]]) 02:00, 23 April 2014 (PDT) | |||
Might be worth noting that since its acid auto-dissolves the corpse, spitters won't rez. [[User:KA101|KA101]] ([[User talk:KA101|talk]]) 18:27, 23 April 2014 (PDT) | |||
Thanks again for spending time revising this KA101. [[User:Candlebury|Candlebury]] ([[User talk:Candlebury|talk]]) 13:19, 24 April 2014 (PDT) | |||
np. I hate line-editing people (because ''I'' hate unsolicited edit requests on my work). However, I presumed you'd want the checkup, since you posted the draft and all. Could well be wrong though; if so, let me know! | |||
(That said: uh, double negation there: "with no considerable", or "without considerable" effort. I'd go for "without", but either works.) [[User:KA101|KA101]] ([[User talk:KA101|talk]]) 17:21, 27 April 2014 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:21, 28 April 2014
spitters
That note about puddle-pulling seems suited for the fighting section. Looks good.KA101 (talk) 00:32, 23 April 2014 (PDT)
Yeah better fit for the fighting section, you are right. Thanks. Candlebury (talk) 02:00, 23 April 2014 (PDT)
Might be worth noting that since its acid auto-dissolves the corpse, spitters won't rez. KA101 (talk) 18:27, 23 April 2014 (PDT)
Thanks again for spending time revising this KA101. Candlebury (talk) 13:19, 24 April 2014 (PDT)
np. I hate line-editing people (because I hate unsolicited edit requests on my work). However, I presumed you'd want the checkup, since you posted the draft and all. Could well be wrong though; if so, let me know!
(That said: uh, double negation there: "with no considerable", or "without considerable" effort. I'd go for "without", but either works.) KA101 (talk) 17:21, 27 April 2014 (PDT)