Template talk:Comestibles/Food: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Addiction results seem to all be zero at the moment.") |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Addiction results seem to all be zero at the moment. | Addiction results seem to all be zero at the moment. | ||
In addition, salted fish, the jerkies and the smoked meat have zero nutrition at the moment. I suspect that this may be due to the jsons using the proportional tag. | |||
:Aoae | |||
:: Yes, food seems to have no addictions, it is drinks and meds with addictions. apart from chocolate covered coffee beans (but not coffee powder hmm... odd, added it to my list of minor things that need to be changed). And there are indeed values missing, thanks for noticing, seems my assumptions on how the nutrition system worked wasn't totally correct --[[User:Soyweiser|Soyweiser]] ([[User talk:Soyweiser|talk]]) 15:12, 6 December 2017 (MST) | |||
:: Fixed the zero nutrition items, but now some items (like cooked offal, and pickled offal) have to high nutrition (I know why btw). --[[User:Soyweiser|Soyweiser]] ([[User talk:Soyweiser|talk]]) 11:55, 7 December 2017 (MST) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:55, 7 December 2017
Addiction results seem to all be zero at the moment. In addition, salted fish, the jerkies and the smoked meat have zero nutrition at the moment. I suspect that this may be due to the jsons using the proportional tag.
- Aoae
- Yes, food seems to have no addictions, it is drinks and meds with addictions. apart from chocolate covered coffee beans (but not coffee powder hmm... odd, added it to my list of minor things that need to be changed). And there are indeed values missing, thanks for noticing, seems my assumptions on how the nutrition system worked wasn't totally correct --Soyweiser (talk) 15:12, 6 December 2017 (MST)
- Fixed the zero nutrition items, but now some items (like cooked offal, and pickled offal) have to high nutrition (I know why btw). --Soyweiser (talk) 11:55, 7 December 2017 (MST)